Adhit Sankaran

Founding Growth

Janet AI

Generalist / FoundingOutbound HeavyConsultativeOn-site📍 San Francisco, CA
Deal Size: TBD - early pricing phase
Sales Cycle: 2-6 weeks
Posted by Adhit Sankaran

Overview

You're the first growth hire at a 3-person YC company building an AI ticketing system. You'll own the entire GTM motion: building outbound sequences to reach engineering leaders, setting up inbound funnels (website, content, demo flow), running early sales conversations, and figuring out what messaging actually converts. This isn't a specialized role—you're doing sales, marketing, ops, and everything in between.


Role Snapshot

AspectDetails
Role TypeGeneralist (Growth + Sales hybrid)
Sales MotionBuilding from scratch - initially outbound-heavy
Deal ComplexityConsultative (selling to eng/product teams)
Sales CycleUnknown - likely 2-6 weeks for early adopters
Deal SizeTBD - early pricing discovery phase
Quota (est.)No formal quota yet - success = pipeline + revenue traction

Company Context

Stage: Pre-seed / YC S25 (Summer 2025 batch)

Size: 3 employees (you'd be #4)

Growth: Just out of YC, onboarding "more teams every week" per post—likely 5-15 customers

Market Position: Category entrant - competing against Linear, Jira, Asana, Height, and other issue tracking tools. Positioned as "AI-native" vs legacy platforms.


GTM Reality

Pipeline Sources:

  • 10% Inbound initially - YC network, word of mouth from early users, website traffic (minimal)
  • 80% Outbound - you'll be building this from zero: cold email, LinkedIn, maybe cold calling
  • 10% Community/Content - creating content to establish thought leadership in AI tooling space

SDR/AE Structure: No SDRs - you're doing everything. Founder might help close bigger deals but you own pipeline generation and most sales conversations.

SE Support: None. You demo the product yourself. Founders may join for technical deep-dives but don't count on it.


Competitive Landscape

Main Competitors: Linear, Jira, Asana, Height, Monday.com, plus newer AI plays like Dust, Puzzle

How They Differentiate: Auto-tracking via Slack/Email/GitHub integration - promises to reduce manual ticket creation. "AI-native" positioning vs legacy workflow tools.

Common Objections:

  • "We already use Linear/Jira and it works"
  • "How accurate is the auto-tracking?"
  • "What happens when it creates wrong tickets?"
  • "Seems early/unproven"

Win Themes: Speed to value (plug into Slack instantly), eliminates manual ticket entry grunt work, stays synced with dev velocity automatically.


What You'll Actually Do

Time Breakdown

Outbound (35%) | Sales Convos (25%) | Marketing/Content (20%) | Ops/Analysis (20%)

Key Activities

  • Building outbound sequences: Researching eng leaders at Series A-C startups (likely ICP), writing cold emails, testing LinkedIn messages, tracking what gets responses. You're doing the manual scraping and sending initially.
  • Running sales conversations: Taking demos, explaining how auto-tracking works, handling objections about accuracy and change management, negotiating pricing (which doesn't exist yet—you'll help define it).
  • Creating inbound assets: Writing blog posts about ticket management pain points, recording demo videos, optimizing the website copy, maybe starting a newsletter. You're the content team.
  • Setting up infrastructure: Building the CRM (probably HubSpot or Attio), creating email sequences in Instantly or Smartlead, setting up analytics, creating sales collateral from scratch.

The Honest Reality

What's Hard

  • You're selling category change - prospects already have a ticketing system. You're asking them to rip it out and trust a 3-person startup's AI. Most will say "we're good."
  • Pricing is undefined - you'll be figuring out what customers will actually pay while trying to close deals. Expect awkward pricing conversations.
  • Wearing every hat is exhausting - one hour you're writing cold emails, next you're demoing, then you're debugging tracking pixels on the website. No specialization.
  • Early product means broken demos - the product will have bugs. Prospects will ask for features that don't exist. You'll lose deals to product gaps.
  • Founder dependency - critical decisions need founder input but they're building product. You'll wait on things or make gut calls that might be wrong.

What Success Looks Like

  • Getting 5-10 demos booked per week from outbound within 3 months
  • Closing 3-5 new customers per month by month 6
  • Building a repeatable outbound motion that the next hire can scale
  • Establishing Janet AI's positioning and messaging that resonates

Who You're Selling To

Primary Buyers:

  • Engineering Managers / VPs of Eng at Series A-C startups (50-200 person companies)
  • Product Managers who own workflow tooling decisions
  • Occasionally CTOs at smaller companies

What They Care About:

  • Reducing eng time spent on ticket admin - devs hate updating Jira, they want to just code
  • Keeping tickets in sync with reality - chronic problem where ticket status doesn't match actual work
  • Minimizing tool switching - they live in Slack/GitHub, want tickets to live there too
  • Proof it works - need to see the AI is accurate, not creating noise

Requirements

  • Experience building outbound motions from scratch (ideally at another early-stage startup)
  • Have personally closed deals before - you need to sell, not just generate leads
  • Comfortable with ambiguity and changing priorities daily
  • Can write compelling copy (emails, website, sales decks) without a marketing team
  • Technical enough to demo dev tooling and talk to engineers credibly
  • Willing to be in SF office daily - this is in-person, founder wants high collaboration
  • Self-starter who doesn't need structure - you'll build your own processes