Overview
You're selling Course Sharingâa product that lets institutions share course content across their networkâto K-12 districts, colleges, and potentially business/government accounts. You'll split time between expanding existing Canvas customers (upsell motion) and hunting net-new accounts that might buy Course Sharing as an entry point into the Instructure ecosystem. Most of your buyers are instructional designers, academic VPs, or district curriculum directors.
Role Snapshot
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Role Type | Full-cycle AE (self-sourcing + closing) |
| Sales Motion | Balanced - some inbound from existing customer base, heavy outbound to new logos |
| Deal Complexity | Consultative - need to explain ROI, integrate with existing LMS setup |
| Sales Cycle | 3-6 months (education buying cycles tied to academic calendar and budget cycles) |
| Deal Size | $25-75K ACV estimated (mid-market EdTech product) |
| Quota (est.) | $400-600K annually |
Company Context
Stage: Public company (KKR-owned after going private in 2020, 2,000+ employees)
Size: 2,166 employees
Growth: Mature core product (Canvas), expanding into adjacent products and new markets (Course Sharing, business/government)
Market Position: Category leader in higher ed LMS (Canvas has dominant market share), now trying to monetize the install base with additional products and crack new segments
GTM Reality
Pipeline Sources:
- 30% Inbound - Existing Canvas customers expressing interest, marketing-generated leads from webinars and product releases
- 50% Outbound - Cold prospecting into K-12 districts, colleges without Course Sharing, competitive accounts using Blackboard/Moodle/D2L
- 20% Internal referrals - Canvas AMs flagging upsell opportunities in their accounts
SDR/AE Structure: Likely self-sourcing for this newer product lineâJake's team is just expanding, so you probably won't have dedicated SDR support initially
SE Support: Shared SE pool for technical demos and POCs when needed, but you'll do most first calls yourself
Competitive Landscape
Main Competitors: Other LMS add-ons, homegrown content-sharing solutions, open-source alternatives, bundled features in competing LMS platforms (Blackboard, D2L, Moodle)
How They Differentiate: Integration with Canvas ecosystem, network effects if multiple institutions use it, Instructure brand credibility in EdTech
Common Objections: "We already share content manually," "Is this really worth the cost vs free tools?" "We need to see other schools using it first," budget constraints in education
Win Themes: Time savings for faculty, quality control for shared content, integration with existing Canvas workflows, data/analytics on content usage
What You'll Actually Do
Time Breakdown
Prospecting (40%) | Active Deals (35%) | Internal Coordination (25%)
Key Activities
- Cold outreach to new districts/institutions: You're researching schools, finding the right contacts (not always easy in educationâlots of committee decision-making), and doing cold calls and emails to book discovery calls. Response rates are lowâeducation moves slowly.
- Discovery and demo calls: You're walking through how Course Sharing works, trying to uncover pain points around content duplication and faculty efficiency. You'll need to understand their current LMS setup and explain integration.
- Multi-stakeholder navigation: Education deals involve curriculum directors, IT, procurement, sometimes faculty committees. You're scheduling and running meetings with multiple people, building consensus.
- Internal coordination: Working with the Canvas AM if it's an existing customer, pulling in SEs for technical questions, coordinating with implementation teams on timelines, getting pricing approvals for non-standard deals.
The Honest Reality
What's Hard
- Education buying cycles are tied to budget years (often July-June) and academic calendarsâdeals slip all the time because "we'll revisit next fiscal year"
- Committee-based decision making means you need 5-8 people to say yes, and any one person can stall the deal
- Course Sharing is a "nice to have" product, not a must-have, so it often loses out to budget priorities
- You're selling something relatively new, so there aren't a ton of case studies or reference customers yet
- K-12 deals can be $15-30K but take 6 months; higher ed deals are bigger but even slower
What Success Looks Like
- Closing 8-12 deals per year in the $25-75K range
- Building a pipeline that's 3-4x your quota because of the slip rate
- Getting repeat business or expansions in year 2 as schools see value
Who You're Selling To
Primary Buyers:
- Chief Academic Officers, VPs of Instruction (higher ed)
- District Curriculum Directors, Instructional Technology Coordinators (K-12)
- Sometimes: CIOs or IT Directors (if integration/security is a concern)
What They Care About:
- Faculty time savings and reducing duplicated effort creating course content
- Quality control and standardization across courses/campuses
- Data on what content is being used and how effective it is
- Budget justificationâclear ROI or cost avoidance story
- Ease of integration with Canvas (or effort required if they're on a different LMS)
Requirements
- 2-3+ years in B2B SaaS sales (EdTech experience is a plus but not required)
- Experience with consultative, multi-stakeholder sales cycles
- Comfortable with self-sourcingâthis isn't an inbound lead machine
- Understanding of education market dynamics helpful (budget cycles, procurement processes, committee decision-making)
- Willingness to learn a newer product and help shape the sales playbook
- Remote role, US-based